Title:
|
Comparison of mean Triglyceride levels in third trimester of Pregnancy in a Patients with and without Pre-Eclampsia
|
||
Authors:
|
|
||
Published on:
|
2023-01-23
|
||
Journal Reference:
|
Volume 14 - Issue 3 Jul – Sep 2022
|
||
Pages:
|
95-98
|
||
Download Abstract:
|
|||
DOI:
|
|||
ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the mean triglyceride levels in women with and without pre-eclampsia during third trimester of pregnancy. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Place and Duration: At Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Aziz Bhatti Shaheed Hospital Gujrat, from 1st July 2020 to 30th Dec 2020. Methodology: In the study 150 pregnant women were included. Pre eclampsia was diagnosed if the women had high blood pressure and proteinuria. Group-A included women having pre-eclampsia and group B women without pre-eclampsia. Serum triglyceride levels were measured by hospital laboratory. For mean triglyceride levels analysis independent sample t-test was used and P-value ≤0.05 was taken as significant. Results: The mean triglyceride level was 234.29±18.88mg/dl in women with pre-eclampsia while 142.33±25.08mg/dl in women without pre-eclampsia. The difference was statistically significant (p=0.001). The effect on mean triglyceride level was independent of age and parity. Conclusion: Serum triglycerides levels were high in pre-eclamptic women compared to women having normal blood pressure. Keywords: Pregnancy, Hypertension, Pre-eclampsia, Proteinuria, Third trimester, Triglycerides
How to Cite This: Riaz M, Naz T, Kalsoom S, Laila U, Nisa K, Safdar F. Comparison of mean Triglyceride levels in third trimester of pregnancy in a patients with and without Pre-Eclampsia. Isra Med J. 2022; 14(3): 95-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55282/imj.oa1321 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |